Program Profile: Offender Reentry Community Safety Program

Formerly called the Dangerous Mentally Ill Offender Program, this is a reentry-planning and service program aimed at reducing recidivism for dangerously mentally ill people in Washington State. The program is rated Promising. Program participants had statistically significantly lower violent felony and overall felony recidivism rates compared with the matched control group 4 years following release from prison.

A Promising rating implies that implementing the program may result in the intended outcome(s).

A Promising rating implies that implementing the program may result in the intended outcome(s).

Program Goals

The Offender Reentry Community Safety (ORCS) Program, formerly called the Dangerous Mentally Ill Offender Program, provides up to 5 years of reentry planning and services to mentally ill people released from prisons in Washington State. In 1999, the Washington State Legislature passed legislation to better identify and improve services to people with mental illness in an effort to decrease the risk they pose to communities and themselves once they are released from prison. Through interagency coordination, the ORCS Program aims to ease the stresses of community reintegration and reduce post-release offending by providing individualized services to people convicted of an offense.

Target Population

The ORCS Program is reserved for individuals who have been officially classified as a dangerously mentally ill by the Department of Corrections (DOC). A dangerously mentally ill offender (DMIO) is someone “with a mental disorder who has been determined to be dangerous to self or others” (Mayfield 2009). Individuals showing signs of dangerous mental illness are referred to the statewide ORCS Committee, which makes an official designation of mental health status.

Program Activities

Once an individual is designated as a DMIO (usually 6 months prior to release), he or she is immediately referred to mental health services within the prison. For 3 to 4 months prior to release, the person receives mental health treatment, transition planning, and other specialized services to prepare for leaving prison. Numerous services are available to participants depending on their needs. Prior to leaving prison, an assessment is conducted to determine what specific assistance the individual will benefit from prior to release and within a community setting.

After release, ORCS program participants continue to receive social services for up to five years. Services available in the community include mental health treatment, housing assistance, substance abuse treatment, medical assistance, and vocational training. DMIO designees are not required to use these services unless it is a condition of their probation.

Key Personnel

The ORCS Program is an interagency collaboration. The DOC makes the official DMIO designation while persons are in prison. They are assigned a treatment provider by the Department of Social and Health Services (DSHS) to begin receiving services. The DSHS also contracts with Regional Support Networks and other providers who offer additional support services for program participants.

Study

In a 4-year evaluation study, Mayfield (2009) used a quasi-experimental matched control group design to examine differences in felony recidivism between participants in the Dangerous Mentally Ill Offender program (now called the Offender Reentry Community Safety Program) and a similar group of nonparticipants with mental illness in Washington State. The treatment group included 172 people deemed DMIOs by a DMIO committee within the Washington State Department of Corrections and who were released from prison before December 31, 2003. The control group consisted of 172 mentally ill prisoners released from prison between January 1, 1996 and December 31, 2000. These individuals were matched to treatment group participants based on eight variables, including number of prior felony convictions, number of days in residential mental health treatment facilities, age, race, gender, annual infraction rate within prison, and the number of past drug offenses. The treatment group was 30 percent nonwhite and 13 percent female, with an average age of 37 at release. The control group was 26 percent nonwhite and 11 percent female, with an average age of 35 at release. At baseline, the control group was equivalent to the treatment group on all of these measures with the exception of age; the treatment group was significantly older than the comparison group.

Recidivism was measured as a reconviction in a Washington State Court for any felony offense within 4 years of release from prison. The analysis focused specifically on all felony recidivism and violent felony recidivism. To discern differences between the treatment and control groups, pairwise comparisons of recidivism were performed and logistic regression was also used to determine differences in post-release offending.

Cost–benefit analyses performed by Mayfield (2009) estimated that for every $1 spent on the Dangerous Mentally Ill Offender program, now called the Offender Reentry Community Safety (ORCS) Program, taxpayers saved $1.64 by preventing recidivism and reducing criminal justice costs. The program costs up to $10,000 per person per year, for a maximum of 5 years. In the first 3 months after the person is released from prison, services cost a flat rate of $6,000. For each subsequent month, service providers are paid $700 if the participant is on Medicaid and $900 if the participant is not. The author estimated that over 4 years, the program costs $33,866 for each participant. <br><br> In 2015, the Washington State Institute for Public Policy updated the cost–benefit analyses of the ORCS Program. The estimated program costs decreased only slightly, to $33,813. It was estimated that for every $1 spent on the ORCS Program, taxpayers saved $1.82 by preventing recidivism and reducing criminal justice costs (Washington State Institute for Public Policy 2015).

These sources were used in the development of the program profile:

These sources were used in the development of the program profile:

Mayfield, Jim.2007. The Dangerous Mentally Ill Offender Program: Cost Effectiveness 2.5 Years After Participants’ Prison Release. Olympia, Wash.: Washington State Institute for Public Policy.

Mayfield, Jim, and David Lovell. 2008. The Dangerous Mentally Ill Offender Program: Three-Year Felony Recidivism and Cost Effectiveness. Olympia, Wash.: Washington State Institute for Public Policy.

Lovell, David, Polly Phipps, and Gregg Gagliardi. 2005. Washington’s Dangerous Mentally Ill Offender Law: Was Community Safety Increased? Olympia, Wash.: Washington State Institute for Public Policy.

Lovell, David, and Jim Mayfield. 2007. Washington’s Dangerous Mentally Ill Offender Law: Program Costs and Developments. Olympia, Wash.: Washington State Institute for Public Policy.

Phipps, Polly, and Gregg Gagliardi. 2002. Washington’s Dangerous Mentally Ill Offender Law: Preliminary Findings. Olympia, Wash.: Washington State Institute for Public Policy.

Phipps, Polly, and Gregg Gagliardi. 2003. Washington’s Dangerous Mentally Ill Offender Law: Program Selection and Interim Report. Olympia, Wash.: Washington State Institute for Public Policy.

Washington State Institute for Public Policy. 2015. Offender Re-entry Community Safety Program (Dangerously Mentally Ill Offenders). Olympia, Wash.: Washington State Institute for Public Policy.

Following are CrimeSolutions-rated programs that are related to this practice:

Adult Reentry Programs

This practice involves correctional programs that focus on the transition of individuals from prison into the community. Reentry programs involve treatment or services that have been initiated while the individual is in custody and a follow-up component after the individual is released. The practice is rated Promising for reducing recidivism.

Evidence Ratings for Outcomes

Crime & Delinquency - Multiple crime/offense types

Rehabilitation Programs for Adults Convicted of a Crime

This practice includes programs that are designed to reduce recidivism among adults by improving their behaviors, skills, mental health, social functioning, and access to education and employment. They may become participants in rehabilitation programs during multiple points in their involvement with the criminal justice system. This practice is rated Promising for reducing recidivism among adults who have been convicted of an offense.

Evidence Ratings for Outcomes

Crime & Delinquency - Multiple crime/offense types

Why might a practice's outcome ratings differ from the ratings of specific programs encompassed by that practice?