Date:
This is a software program designed to teach adolescents to avoid violence. The program is rated Ineffective. Students in the treatment group demonstrated a statistically significant higher level of self-awareness and higher intentions to use nonviolent strategies, as well as diminished beliefs in violence, compared with the control group students. However, there was no statistically significant difference in aggressive behavior between groups, which is the main goal of the program.
An Ineffective rating implies that implementing the program is unlikely to result in the intended outcome(s).
This program's rating is based on evidence that includes at least one high-quality randomized controlled trial.
An Ineffective rating implies that implementing the program is unlikely to result in the intended outcome(s).
This program's rating is based on evidence that includes at least one high-quality randomized controlled trial.
Program Goals
SMART Team (Students Managing Anger and Resolution Together) is a multimedia software program that uses games, simulation, animation, cartoons, and interactive interviews that engage adolescents in learning new skills to resolve conflicts and avoid violence. The computer-assisted intervention allows for interactivity, flexibility, personalization, and anonymity—aspects that may appeal to the target population.
The program has three major components:
- Anger management. Animation, interactive assessment interviews, and games teach students to recognize situations that can trigger anger, as well as how to handle their anger.
- Perspective taking. Games show students anger-causing situations from the different perspectives of people involved in those situations. Interviews of celebrities and older kids are shown to demonstrate how they handle conflict.
- Dispute resolution. An interactive mediation tool guides students in generating solutions to their conflict, resulting in a printed contract.
Target Population/Program Activities
SMART Team is an eight-module, multimedia software program that teaches violence prevention concepts and methods to students in grades 6 through 9 (11 to 15 years old). The program’s content may be used in conjunction with conflict mediation curricula and other violence prevention strategies. Students can independently access modules for information, to build skills, or to resolve a conflict, eliminating the need for trained adult implementers.
Bosworth and colleagues (2000) found that the SMART Talk treatment group demonstrated a statistically significant higher level of self-awareness of aggressive behaviors, diminished beliefs supportive of violence, and greater intentions to use nonviolent strategies. However, there was no statistically significant effect on self-efficacy or aggressive behavior (the main goal of the program was to reduce aggression in students). Therefore, the preponderance of evidence suggests the program did not have the intended effect on participant behavior.
Study 1
Beliefs Supportive of Violence
Students in the treatment group demonstrated diminished beliefs supportive of violence, compared with students in the control group. This difference was statistically significant.
Intentions to Use Nonviolent Strategies
Students in the treatment group demonstrated greater intentions to use nonviolent strategies, compared with students in the control group. This difference was statistically significant.
Self-Efficacy
There was no statistically significant difference between groups in self-efficacy or confidence in using nonviolent strategies.
Self-Awareness
Students in the treatment group demonstrated a higher self-awareness of aggressive behaviors, compared with students in the control group. This difference was statistically significant.
Aggression
There were no statistically significant differences between the treatment and control groups in aggressive behavior.
Study
Bosworth and colleagues (2000) collected data from a middle school near a large Midwestern U.S. city in 1995. The authors described the student population as “diverse,” with 12 percent from the inner city and 20 percent living in the nearby low-income rural area. The middle school randomly placed students on one of three teams at the beginning of each year to organize their academic activities. Each grade (6th, 7th, and 8th) had three teams of 100 to 120 students. Students had little interaction with other teams throughout the school day. The intervention randomly assigned two teams from each grade to the SMART Talk condition and one team to the control condition. The lack of contact between teams, which minimized potential for contamination between treatment conditions, was one reason why researchers conducted randomization at the team level rather than the individual level.
The sample consisted of 558 students. Fifty-four percent were girls; 46 percent were boys. The group consisted of 42, 31, and 27 percent of 6th, 7th, and 8th graders, respectively. The sample was 84 percent white, 9 percent African American, 4 percent biracial, and 4 percent of other ethnicities. The sample’s family arrangements varied: 49 percent of the children lived with both parents; 20 percent lived with a parent and stepparent; 28 percent lived with a single parent; and 3 percent reported other living arrangements (foster care, living with grandparents, etc.).
The outcomes of interest were aggressive behavior, self-awareness, beliefs supportive of violence, self-efficacy, and intentions to use nonviolent strategies. Aggressive behavior was measured through a self-reported 4-item Aggression Scale and a 3-item Conflict Tactic Scale. Self-awareness, beliefs supportive of violence, self-efficacy, and intentions to use nonviolent strategies were all assessed using self-report scales. The study looked at baseline equivalency and performed repeated measures with multiple analysis of variance, with additional multivariate analysis to assess the effects of one semester of intervention. However, the analysis only featured pre- and posttests with no follow-up. The study authors did not conduct subgroup analyses.
These sources were used in the development of the program profile:
Study
Bosworth, Kris, Dorothy Espelage, Tracy DuBay, Gary Daytner, and Kathryn Karageorge. 2000. “Preliminary Evaluation of a Multimedia Violence Prevention Program for Adolescents.” American Journal of Health Behavior 24(4):268–280.
These sources were used in the development of the program profile:
Bosworth, Kris, Linda L. Dahlberg, Dorothy Espelage, Gary Daytner, and Tracy DuBay. 1996. “Using Multimedia to Teach Conflict-Resolution Skills to Young Adolescents.” American Journal of Preventive Medicine 12(5):65–74.
Bosworth, Kris, Dorothy Espelage, and Tracy DuBay. 1998. “A Computer-Based Violence Prevention Intervention for Young Adolescents: Pilot Study.” Adolescence 33(132):785–795. (This study was reviewed but did not meet CrimeSolutions criteria for inclusion in the overall program rating.)
Age: 11 - 15
Gender: Male, Female
Race/Ethnicity: White, Black, Other
Geography: Suburban Urban Rural
Setting (Delivery): School
Program Type: Conflict Resolution/Interpersonal Skills, Violence Prevention
Current Program Status: Active