Date:
This is an early intervention program designed to identify kindergarten children with antisocial behavior and introduce adaptive behavioral strategies to help prevent further antisocial behavior in school. The program is rated Effective. Treatment group students demonstrated statistically significant positive improvements in adaptive behavior, aggression, problem behaviors, and academic engagement, compared with control group students.
An Effective rating implies that implementing the program is likely to result in the intended outcome(s).
This program's rating is based on evidence that includes at least one high-quality randomized controlled trial.
This program's rating is based on evidence that includes either 1) one study conducted in multiple sites; or 2) two or three studies, each conducted at a different site. Learn about how we make the multisite determination.
An Effective rating implies that implementing the program is likely to result in the intended outcome(s).
This program's rating is based on evidence that includes at least one high-quality randomized controlled trial.
This program's rating is based on evidence that includes either 1) one study conducted in multiple sites; or 2) two or three studies, each conducted at a different site. Learn about how we make the multisite determination.
Program Goal/Target Population
First Step to Success is an early intervention program designed to identify children with antisocial behavior and introduce adaptive behavioral strategies to prevent antisocial behavior in school. The program has both school and home components.
The primary goal of the program is to divert antisocial kindergartners from an antisocial behavior pattern during their subsequent school careers and to develop in them the competencies needed to build effective teacher- and peer-related, social–behavioral adjustments.
Program Theory
The program targets at-risk kindergartners who show the early signs of an antisocial pattern of behavior (e.g., aggression, oppositional–defiant behavior, severe fits of temper, victimization of others). The intervention is based on the early-starter model of the development of antisocial behavior. Signs of conduct problems can be detected as early as preschool. Many children bring a pattern of antisocial behavior with them from home when they enter school. This early pattern can indicate the beginning of a stable pattern of maladaptive behavior that predicts more severe problems later on when the youths are less amenable to treatment. More severe problems include issues such as peer rejection, school dropout, and delinquency.
Program Components
First Step to Success consists of three interconnected modules: 1) proactive, universal screening of all kindergarteners, 2) school intervention involving the teacher, peers, and the target child that teaches adaptive behavior patterns, and 3) parent/caregiver training and involvement to support the child’s school adjustment. The intervention is implemented over 3 months. Components are delivered in both school and home settings.
A key part of the program is the behavioral coaches who act as caseworkers for two to three students and are responsible for implementing and coordinating the school and home components of the intervention. Coaches are trained through lectures, videotaped demonstrations, role-playing, skill practice/feedback sessions, materials, and self-evaluation. Training, monitoring, and supervision processes are implemented to build fidelity.
The facilitative strategy of the program relies on having the coach work with teachers and parents to give them the skills to teach students replacement behaviors and reward students when those behaviors are used appropriately and consistently. Strategies for implementation include schedules for praising and awarding points, prepared scripts, daily task lists, and guidelines for application. Students are taught specific skills and behaviors to use in place of inappropriate behaviors they have used in the past. More specifically, during the school day, the coach or teacher gives the First Step to Success student visual cues (i.e., a green or red card) to indicate whether or not he or she is on task and using appropriate behaviors. Throughout the day, the student accrues points toward his or her behavioral goal. If the student makes the daily goals, he or she gets to choose an enjoyable activity the whole class can do and appreciate.
Each evening, parents receive feedback about how their child’s day went. Parents are trained through six weekly meetings with the coach, and they are encouraged to reward the student’s positive behavior by spending some extra time with their child at an activity, such as playing a game or taking a walk together.
Study 1
Adaptive Behavior
Walker and colleagues (1998) found that treatment group students who participated in the First Step to Success program demonstrated higher levels of adaptive behavior (i.e., age-appropriate behaviors such social skills and personal responsibility), compared with students in the waitlist control group, at postintervention. This difference was statistically significant.
Maladaptive Behavior
Treatment group students demonstrated less maladaptive behavior (i.e., dealing with problems through avoidance or passive aggression) compared with control group students, at postintervention. This difference was statistically significant.
Aggression
Treatment group students demonstrated less aggression, compared with control group students, at postintervention. This difference was statistically significant.
Withdrawn Behavior
There was no statistically significant difference between treatment and control groups in withdrawn behavior at postintervention.
Academic Engagement Time
Treatment group students spent more time in academic engagement, compared with control group students, at postintervention. This difference was statistically significant.
Study 2
Adaptive Behavior
Walker and colleagues (2005) found that treatment group students who participated in the First Step to Success program demonstrated greater improvements in adaptive behavior, compared with control group students, at postintervention. This difference was statistically significant.
Maladaptive Behavior
Treatment group students demonstrated greater decreases in maladaptive behavior, compared with control group students, at postintervention. This difference was statistically significant.
Aggression
Treatment group students demonstrated greater decreases in aggression, compared with control group students, at postintervention. This difference was statistically significant.
Academic Engagement Time
Treatment group students demonstrated greater increases in time spent engaged in academics, compared with control group students, at postintervention. This difference was statistically significant.
Study 3
Academic Competence
Treatment group students demonstrated higher scores on the Academic Competence subscale of the Social Skills Rating System, compared with control group students, at postintervention. This difference was statistically significant.
Teacher-Reported Problem Behaviors
Teachers of treatment group students who participated in the First Step to Success program reported fewer behavior problems, compared with teachers of control group students, at postintervention. This difference was statistically significant.
Parent-Reported Problem Behaviors
Parents of treatment group students reported fewer behavior problems, compared with parents of control group students, at postintervention. This difference was statistically significant.
Teacher-Reported Functional Social Impairment
Teachers of treatment group students reported more functional social skills such as adaptive behaviors, compared with teachers of control group students, at postintervention. This difference was statistically significant.
Parent-Reported Functional Social Impairment
Parents of treatment group students reported more functional social skills, compared with parents of control group students, at postintervention. This difference was statistically significant.
Teacher-Reported Academic Engagement Time
Teachers of treatment group students reported more time spent in academic engagement, compared with teachers of control group students, at postintervention. This difference was statistically significant.
Study
Walker and colleagues (1998) used a waitlist cohort design to assess the impact of First Step to Success on antisocial behavior. Forty-six kindergartners who met participation criteria were randomly assigned to experimental and waitlist control groups. Participation criteria were met by kindergarteners who, upon nomination by their teachers, exceeded the Early Screening Project criteria (an age-appropriate adaptation of the Systematic Screening for Behavioral Disorders) and were observed as not being appropriately engaged in teacher-assigned tasks and activities. Baseline performance measures (teacher ratings and behavioral observations) were recorded for the at-risk kindergartners.
The participants were from two cohorts who participated in the study over 2 years. The sample was 26 percent female and 7 percent minority status. Thirty-seven percent of the students were considered low income. Eleven children qualified for special education services (five were classified as learning disabled, four as speech-language impaired, and two as severely emotionally disturbed). For both cohorts, data was collected at pretest, posttest, and first grade follow-up. Cohort 1 also participated in a second grade follow-up. Data included five dependent measures: 1) teacher ratings of adaptive behavior for the Early Screening Project (ESP) procedure, 2) teacher ratings of maladaptive behavior from the ESP, 3) observation of appropriate attention to teacher, 4) aggression subscale on Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) teacher report form, and 5) withdrawn subscale on the CBCL teacher report form. Baseline measures were used as covariates in all analyses. Findings were similar for cohorts 1 and 2, so the samples were combined and compared with waitlist controls. No subgroup analyses were conducted.
Study
Walker and colleagues (2005) used a quasi-experimental design to assess the impact of First Step to Success with a sample of 181 kindergarten through second grade children in 11 Oregon counties. The evaluators constructed an untreated control group of students eligible for the program but not receiving it. The scores of this untreated group were combined with the scores of the control group (n = 22) from Study 1 (Walker et al. 1998). The total sample for this hybrid control group was 30 children.
Children in the treatment condition were referred by teachers
Study
Walker and colleagues (2009) used a randomized control trial to assess the impact of First Step to Success. The study was conducted with two cohorts over 4 years in 34 elementary schools in the urban Albuquerque (N.M.) Public Schools (APS). Classrooms were randomly assigned to either the intervention or usual care comparison group. The full sample consisted of 200 students in first through third grades.
Random assignment occurred at the classroom level within waves; only one student per class was included in the study. Randomization occurred before parental consent. Cohort 1 comprised 99 students (44 usual care; 55 intervention). Cohort 2 comprised 101 students (55 usual care, 46 intervention). The Systematic Screening for Behavior Disorder (SSBD) was used to identify children for participation. Parental consent was obtained for 210 of the 260 recruited teachers/classrooms; of these, 107 were randomly assigned to the intervention and 103 to the comparison condition.
The sample was predominantly male (73 percent). Eighty-three students were first graders, 69 were second graders, and 48 were third graders. Fifty-seven percent were Hispanic, 24.5 percent white, 7.0 percent African American, 4.5 percent American Indian, 3.0 percent multiracial, 0.5 percent Asian or Pacific Islander, and 3.0 percent unknown. Seventy percent were eligible for free or reduced-price lunches. Eighty-eight percent came from primarily English-speaking households, and 16 percent were English language learners.
Twenty-four coaches were recruited from a pool of behavior management specialists and six behavior consultants from the APS behavior consultation service team. All staff received training.
Outcome data was collected from teacher- and parent-reported measures from the Social Skills Rating System, teacher-reported measures from the SSBD, direct observations using the SSBD measure of student academic engaged time, and individual academic performance measures using the Woodcock–Johnson III Letter–Word Identification subtests and oral reading fluency tests. Data was collected at baseline and postintervention. The evaluators conducted an intent-to-treat analysis, using multivariate analysis of covariance (MANCOVA) and analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) models. No subgroup analyses were conducted.
In 2015, the original publisher of First Step to Success (Sopris West, Inc) announced that it would no longer publish, market, or distribute the program. More information about the program can still be found at the publisher’s website.
These sources were used in the development of the program profile:
Study
Walker, Hill M., Kate A. Kavanagh, Bruce Stiller, Annemieke M. Golly, Herbert H. Severson, and Edward G. Feil. 1998. “First Step to Success: An Early Intervention Approach for Preventing School Antisocial Behavior.” Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders 6:66–81.
Walker, Hill M., Annemieke M. Golly, Janae Zolna McLane, and Madeleine Kimmich. 2005. “The Oregon First Step to Success Replication Initiative: Statewide Results of an Evaluation of the Program’s Impact.” Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders 13(3):163–72.
Walker, Hill M., John R. Seeley, Jason Small, Herbert H. Severson, Bethany A. Graham, Edward G. Feil, Loretta Serna, Annemieke M. Golly, and Steven R. Forness. 2009. “A Randomized Controlled Trial of the First Step to Success Early Intervention.” Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders 17(4):197–213.
These sources were used in the development of the program profile:
Greenberg, Mark T., Celene E. Domitrovich, and Brian Bumbarger. 2000. “Preventing Mental Disorders in School-Age Children: A Review of the Effectiveness of Prevention Programs.” State College, Pa.: Prevention Research Center for the Promotion of Human Development College of Health and Human Development, Pennsylvania State University.
Age: 5 - 8
Gender: Male, Female
Race/Ethnicity: White, Black, Hispanic, American Indians/Alaska Native, Asian/Pacific Islander, Other
Geography: Suburban Urban Rural
Setting (Delivery): School, Home
Program Type: Classroom Curricula, Conflict Resolution/Interpersonal Skills, Parent Training, School/Classroom Environment
Current Program Status: Not Active
1265 University of Oregon 1776 Millrace Dr.
Dr. Hill M. Walker
Professor
The University of Oregon Institute on Violence and Destructive Behavior
Eugene, OR 97403
United States
Website
Email
Dr. Annemieke Golly
First Step Head Trainer and Technical Assistance Provider
Oregon Research Institute
Eugene, OR 97403
United States
Website
Email