Date:
Red-light cameras are a traffic enforcement mechanism that permit police to remotely enforce traffic signals, to deter red-light running at signalized intersections. Red-light cameras are a fully automated photo detection system that includes cameras, sensors or triggers, and a computer. The practice is rated Promising for reducing total injury crashes. The practice is rated Ineffective for reducing total crashes, total property-damage-only crashes, or total red-light-running crashes.
Practice Goals/Target Sites
Red-light cameras are a traffic enforcement mechanism that permit police to remotely enforce traffic signals, to deter drivers who intentionally run red traffic lights at signalized intersections. Red-light cameras permit police to remotely enforce traffic signals on a continuous basis without human intervention, which allows police to engage in other activities. The red-light cameras provide a physical record of all violations.
Practice Components
Red-light cameras are a fully automated photo detection system that includes three key elements: 1) cameras, 2) sensors or triggers, and 3) a computer. The cameras are located on one arm of an intersection where a red-light-running problem has been identified or are placed on all four corners of an intersection, so that vehicles coming from any direction can be photographed from multiple angles. The cameras are activated if a vehicle moves over two triggers at a predetermined speed. However, if the vehicle has stopped on an induction loop or activates only the first of the two triggers, the computer will not signal the cameras to activate. The cameras take still photos or video images, or both. Modern systems generally use digital cameras, but some older systems may use 35-mm cameras.
Most camera systems take at least two photographs and superimpose the date and time of the red-light violation, the location of the intersection, the speed at which the vehicle was traveling, and the amount of time elapsed between the light turning red and the vehicle entering the intersections (FHA 2004). After the cameras capture images of vehicles as they violate a red traffic signal and the evidence is reviewed, penalty tickets are sent to the address where the violating vehicle is registered.
Public awareness is an essential component of red-light camera programs and is accomplished through public education in media campaigns and posting warning signs in intersections with cameras. Other methods for alerting communities of red-light camera programs include mailing written notices to local residents or implementing a 30-day warning period before beginning the formal enforcement.
Warning signs are designed to increase driver awareness of the automated enforcement and enhance their deterrent effect.
Signs may be posted at or near the intersection with red-light cameras, at major entrance points to the city, or placed at both locations. In some cases, the use and placement of warning signs may be mandated by legislative requirements and can vary by state.
|
Crime & Delinquency | Total injury crashes
Cohn and colleagues (2020) found that, across 16 independent samples from 15 studies, red-light camera interventions had a statistically significant effect on reducing total injury resulting from traffic crashes in intersections with cameras, compared with intersections without cameras. The overall pooled estimate of effect suggests that red-light camera interventions were associated with a 20 percent decrease in total injury resulting from traffic crashes. |
|
Crime & Delinquency | Total property damage only crashes
Cohn and colleagues (2020) found that, across six independent samples from six studies, red-light camera interventions had no statistically significant effect on the total property damage resulting from traffic crashes. |
|
Crime & Delinquency | Total red-light running crashes
Cohn and colleagues (2020) found that, across seven independent samples from six studies, red-light camera interventions had no statistically significant effect on total number of red-light running resulting in traffic crashes. |
|
Crime & Delinquency | Total crashes
Cohn and colleagues (2020) found that, across 23 independent samples from 20 studies, red-light camera interventions had no statistically significant effect on total traffic crashes at intersections. |
These sources were used in the development of the practice profile:
Cohn, Ellen G., Suman Kakar, Chloe Perkins, Rebecca Steinbach, and Phil Edwards. 2020. "Red-Light Camera Interventions for Reducing Traffic Violations and Traffic Crashes: A Systematic Review." Campbell Systematic Review 16. View abstract
These sources were used in the development of the practice profile:
Aeron–Thomas, A., and Hess, S. 2005. “Red-Light Cameras for the Prevention of Road Traffic Crashes (Review).” Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2.
Bochner, B., and T. Walden. 2010. Effectiveness of Red-Light Cameras: A Texas Transportation Institute White Paper (Unpublished paper). Retrieved from
Federal Highway Administration (FHA). 2004. Using Red-Light Cameras to Reduce Red-Light Running (RLR).
FHA. 2005. Red-Light Camera Systems: Operational Guidelines.
Setting (Delivery): Other Community Setting
Practice Type: Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design/Design Against Crime, General deterrence, Situational Crime Prevention
Unit of Analysis: Places