Date:
This practice encompasses programs that provide youths with formal supportive relationships and various positive, community-based activities and experiences to reduce their need to use alcohol and/or drugs. The practice is rated Effective for reducing the likelihood of alcohol initiation and reducing the likelihood of drug use initiation.
Practice Goals/Target Population
Research has found that by senior year of high school, almost 70 percent of students in the United States will have tasted alcohol, about half will have taken an illegal drug, and more than 20 percent will have used a prescription drug for a nonprescribed purpose (Erdem and Kaufman 2020). One method to prevent youth substance use is through mentoring, defined as “a relationship over a prolonged period of time between two or more people where an older, caring, more experienced individual provides help to the younger person as [they go] through life” (Center for Substance Abuse Prevention 2000, 2). The goal of mentoring programs that are designed specifically to prevent youth substance use is to reduce the time youths have to associate with users of alcohol and drugs, and give youths less need to use drugs and alcohol to alter their mood or please their peers.
Practice Components
Mentoring can affect targeted youth through a variety of programming and activities. To prevent youth substance use, mentoring programs often involve frequent contact with mentors; the training of mentors, who also receive ongoing supervision; and the behavioral change techniques designed to target specific problem behaviors that produce negative consequences. Programs also generally offer an array of activities linked to mentoring, to ensure that the mentee is involved often in positive community experiences.
Mentoring programs typically match youths with mentors and encourage mentors to meet regularly with mentees for support in various aspects of life; to educate mentees on health and substance abuse; to work with mentees to improve coping, problem-solving, and communication skills; to involve mentees in community service activities, such as visiting the elderly; and to offer cultural activities and educational services/tutoring. The underlying strategies are to keep the mentees busy and involved in positive experiences, and to provide them feedback and encouragement from the positive mentors with whom they bond.
Key Personnel
Mentors are “formal,” meaning they are assigned to youths as part of a program. The mentor–mentee relationship is often a symmetrical one of sharing ideas and experiences, with the mentor guiding the mentee to achieve behavior or goals that they define together.
|
Drugs & Substance Abuse | Alcohol
Examining the results across two randomized controlled trials, Thomas, Lorenzetti and Spragins (2011) found a statistically significant effect of mentoring on youth alcohol use (risk ratio = 0.71). This means that youths in the treatment group who received mentoring demonstrated a reduced risk of initiating alcohol use, compared with youths in the control group who did not receive mentoring. Such results should be interpreted with caution, however, given that only two studies were included in the analysis. |
|
Drugs & Substance Abuse | Multiple substances
Examining the results across two randomized controlled trials, Thomas, Lorenzetti and Spragins (2011) found a statistically significant effect of mentoring on preventing youth drug use (risk ratio = 0.54). This means that youths in the treatment group who received mentoring demonstrated a reduced risk of initiating drug use, compared with youths in the control group who did not receive mentoring. Such results should be interpreted with caution, however, given that only two studies were included in the analysis. |
These sources were used in the development of the practice profile:
Thomas, Roger E., Diane Lorenzetti, and Wendy Spragins. 2011. “Mentoring Adolescents to Prevent Drug and Alcohol Use.” Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 11(CD007381). View abstract
These sources were used in the development of the practice profile:
Erdem, Gizem, and Michelle R. Kaufman. 2020. Mentoring for Preventing and Reducing Substance Use and Associated Risks Among Youth: National Mentoring Resource Center Outcome Review. Boston, Mass.: National Mentoring Resource Center.
Parenting IS Prevention Project (PIPP). Mentoring Initiatives: An Overview of Youth Mentoring. 2000. Rockville, Md.: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, Center for Substance Abuse Prevention.
Rosenblum, Andrew, Stephen Magura, Chunki Fong, Phyllis Curry, Christine Norwood, and Doris Casella. 2005. “Effects of Peer Mentoring on HIV–Affected Youths’ Substance Use Risk and Association With Substance Using Friends.” Journal of Social Service Research 32(2):45–60.
Following are CrimeSolutions-rated programs that are related to this practice:
The meta-analysis by Thompson, Lorenzetti, and Spragins (2011) was originally reviewed for CrimeSolutions in 2013 as part of the Mentoring for Youth Development practice. In 2022, as part of a re-review of the Mentoring for Youth Development practice, it was decided that Thompson, Lorenzetti, and Spragins (2011) would become a separate practice focused on Mentoring to Prevent Substance Use.
Age: 13 - 18
Gender: Male, Female
Setting (Delivery): School, Other Community Setting
Practice Type: Alcohol and Drug Prevention, Mentoring
Unit of Analysis: Persons