Profile Updated:
Summary: This is an intensive family program combining relapse prevention and parenting skills training to reduce parents’ drug use and the likelihood of substance abuse among their children. The program is rated Promising for reducing parental drug use and increasing household rules, and Ineffective for reducing children’s alcohol use, alcohol dependence, any substance abuse, cocaine abuse, opiate abuse, marijuana use, and dependence on drugs. (Review the full program description).
| Title | Rating | Details | Outcome Category | Study(ies) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Parental drug use | Overall, parents in the treatment group reported less drug use after participating in the program compared with parents in the control group, based on multiple measures from the study. This difference was statistically significant. |
Family functioning; Parental substance use/drug use | Catalano, Richard F., Randy R. Gainey, Charles B. Fleming, Kevin P. Haggerty, and Norman O. Johnson. 1999. “An Experimental Intervention With Families of Substance Abusers: One-Year Follow-Up of the Focus on Families Project.” Addiction 94(2):241–54. See evaluation methods. |
|
| Alcohol Use (multisite) | Overall, there was no statistically significant difference in alcohol use between children in the treatment group and children in the control group based on multiple measures from two studies. |
Drugs and substance abuse; Use of legal substances; Alcohol use | Catalano, Richard F., Randy R. Gainey, Charles B. Fleming, Kevin P. Haggerty, and Norman O. Johnson. 1999. “An Experimental Intervention With Families of Substance Abusers: One-Year Follow-Up of the Focus on Families Project.” Addiction 94(2):241–54. See evaluation methods. Haggerty, Kevin P., Martie L. Skinner, Charles B. Fleming, Randy R. Gainey, and Richard F. Catalano. 2008. “Long-Term Effects of the Focus on Families Project on Substance Use Disorders Among Children of Parents in Methadone Treatment.” Addiction 103:2008–16. See evaluation methods. |
|
| Alcohol dependence | There was no statistically significant difference in alcohol dependence between children in the treatment group and children in the control group at the long-term follow-up. |
Drug and substance abuse; Severe alcohol use | Haggerty, Kevin P., Martie L. Skinner, Charles B. Fleming, Randy R. Gainey, and Richard F. Catalano. 2008. “Long-Term Effects of the Focus on Families Project on Substance Use Disorders Among Children of Parents in Methadone Treatment.” Addiction 103:2008–16. See evaluation methods. |
|
| Any substance abuse | There was no statistically significant difference in abuse of any substance between children in the treatment group and children in the control group at the long-term follow-up. |
Drugs and substance abuse; Use of multiple substances | Haggerty, Kevin P., Martie L. Skinner, Charles B. Fleming, Randy R. Gainey, and Richard F. Catalano. 2008. “Long-Term Effects of the Focus on Families Project on Substance Use Disorders Among Children of Parents in Methadone Treatment.” Addiction 103:2008–16. See evaluation methods. |
|
| Cocaine/amphetamine abuse | There was no statistically significant difference in cocaine/amphetamine abuse between children in the treatment group and children in the control group at the long-term follow-up. |
Drugs and substance abuse; Use of illegal substances | Haggerty, Kevin P., Martie L. Skinner, Charles B. Fleming, Randy R. Gainey, and Richard F. Catalano. 2008. “Long-Term Effects of the Focus on Families Project on Substance Use Disorders Among Children of Parents in Methadone Treatment.” Addiction 103:2008–16. See evaluation methods. |
|
| Opiate abuse | There was no statistically significant difference in opiate abuse between children in the treatment group and children in the control group at the long-term follow-up. |
Drugs and substance abuse; Heroin/opioid use | Haggerty, Kevin P., Martie L. Skinner, Charles B. Fleming, Randy R. Gainey, and Richard F. Catalano. 2008. “Long-Term Effects of the Focus on Families Project on Substance Use Disorders Among Children of Parents in Methadone Treatment.” Addiction 103:2008–16. See evaluation methods. |
|
| Marijuana use (multisite) | Overall, there was no statistically significant difference in marijuana use between children in the treatment group and children in the control group based on multiple measures from two studies. |
Drugs and substance abuse; Use of illegal substances; Marijuana/cannabis | Catalano, Richard F., Randy R. Gainey, Charles B. Fleming, Kevin P. Haggerty, and Norman O. Johnson. 1999. “An Experimental Intervention With Families of Substance Abusers: One-Year Follow-Up of the Focus on Families Project.” Addiction 94(2):241–54. See evaluation methods. Haggerty, Kevin P., Martie L. Skinner, Charles B. Fleming, Randy R. Gainey, and Richard F. Catalano. 2008. “Long-Term Effects of the Focus on Families Project on Substance Use Disorders Among Children of Parents in Methadone Treatment.” Addiction 103:2008–16. See evaluation methods. |
|
| Dependence on drugs | Overall, there was no statistically significant difference in dependence on drugs between children in the treatment group and children in the control group at the long-term follow-up based on multiple measures from the study. |
Drugs and substance abuse; Severe drug use | Haggerty, Kevin P., Martie L. Skinner, Charles B. Fleming, Randy R. Gainey, and Richard F. Catalano. 2008. “Long-Term Effects of the Focus on Families Project on Substance Use Disorders Among Children of Parents in Methadone Treatment.” Addiction 103:2008–16. See evaluation methods. |
|
| Household rules | Parents in the treatment group reported that more rules had been defined in their households after participating in the program, compared with parents in the control group. This difference was statistically significant. |
Family functioning; Parenting skills; Behavior management skills | Catalano, Richard F., Randy R. Gainey, Charles B. Fleming, Kevin P. Haggerty, and Norman O. Johnson. 1999. “An Experimental Intervention With Families of Substance Abusers: One-Year Follow-Up of the Focus on Families Project.” Addiction 94(2):241–54. See evaluation methods. |
Program Goals/Target Population
Families Facing the Future (previously called Focus on Families) is an intensive family program for parents in methadone treatment and their children. It combines relapse prevention and parenting skills training with home-based case management services. Its goal is to address risk factors for relapse in people with addiction and risk and protective factors for future drug abuse and problem behaviors by their children.
Program Theory
The program is based on the Social Development Model (Catalano and Hawkins 1996), which organizes empirical information on risk and protective factors into a development theory of antisocial behavior. Families Facing the Future specifically addresses risk factors related to relapse among people addicted to opiates as well as risk and protective factors associated with drug use among their children.
Program Components/Key Personnel
The parenting skill training consists of 53 hours of training in small groups of 6 to 10 families. There is an initial 5-hour family retreat, with parents and children attending, and 32 ninety-minute meetings twice a week. Children attend one or two sessions so parents can practice skills while their children are supervised. Trainers with master’s-level experience lead the meetings and follow a curriculum created for the program. The curriculum incorporates motivation, discussion, modeling, guided practice, independent practice, and generalization. Parents are trained on skills such as:
- Relapse prevention and coping
- Anger management
- Child development and communication skills
- Holding family meetings
- Setting clear expectations of children
- Use of appropriate rewards and disciplinary consequences
The complete home-based case management component lasts about 9 months. It begins 1 month before the start of the parent training sessions and continues while parents are participating in the training meetings and for 4 months afterward. Visits are about 90 minutes once a week, plus two phone calls each week. With case managers’ assistance, families set goals, monitor progress toward the goals, and reinforce skills learned in the parent training meetings. Case managers help families hold family meetings, increase opportunities for positive family involvement, and promote opportunities for positive activities for children outside of the family.
Study Title: Experimental Intervention With Families of Substance Abusers: One-Year Follow-Up of the Focus on Families Project (which is associated with outcomes Parental drug use, Alcohol Use, Marijuana use, and Household rules)
Research Design/Sample
Catalano and colleagues (1999) used a randomized experimental design to evaluate the effect of Families Facing the Future (known at the time as Focus on Families) on parental drug use, parenting skills, and the prevention of drug and alcohol use by their children. Participants were recruited while in two methadone clinics in Seattle, WA. To be eligible for the study, participants had to have been in treatment for at least 90 days, have at least one child between the ages of 3 and 14 who lived with them at least 50 percent of the time, and live within 25 miles of the methadone clinic. There were 130 families enrolled and randomized into treatment (n = 75) or control (n = 55) groups. There were 144 methadone-treated parents and 178 children (treatment n = 97, control n = 81) included in the 130 families. Families in the treatment group received methadone services plus the supplemental Families Facing the Future services, while families in the control received methadone services with no supplemental services. Standard methadone services included methadone dispensing and some individual and group counseling.
Participating parents were mostly white (77 percent), female (75 percent), between the ages of 29 and 41, and longtime opiate users (15 years or more). While 60 percent of the parents lived with their partner or spouse, only 20 percent were married. A little more than half (54 percent) of the parents reported any illicit drug use in the month before baseline. Parents had spent an average of 15 months in methadone treatment before enrollment. Sixty-eight percent of the parents had been incarcerated at some point in their lives, and 66 percent had been unemployed in the last 3 months before their participation. Participating children were ages 8 to 12. Families were grouped into blocks based on race, parents’ age at first drug use, whether parents lived with a spouse or partner, and ages of children before randomization. Families within blocks were randomly assigned to the treatment or control condition with a higher proportion assigned to the treatment condition. There were no statistically significant differences between treatment and control groups at baseline.
Data Collection/Outcome Measures
Parents were assessed at baseline, posttest, 6 months, and 12 months. Children were assessed at baseline, 6 months, and 12 months. The CrimeSolutions review of this study focused on results at the 12-month follow-up for both parents and children. Developmentally appropriate interviews were used for the age groups 6–8, 9–10, and 11 and older based on age at time of interview. Data was presented for children in the 9–10 and in the 11 and older groups.
The study examined the program’s impact on parental drug use, parenting skills, and children’s use of alcohol and marijuana. Parental drug use (self-report) was a combined measure of how many times a parent used marijuana, heroin, or cocaine in the previous month. In addition, 25 percent of the participating parents were randomly selected to provide a urine sample to test the validity of the self-reports. There were few false negatives, and there was no significant difference between false negatives in the treatment and control groups. Parents were also asked about household rules (whether their household had rules regarding items such as television, chores, or drug use). Children’s alcohol use was assessed by asking children whether they drank alcohol (more than a sip) in the previous 6 months, and their marijuana use was assessed by asking whether they used marijuana in the previous month.
Statistical Analysis
All outcomes were examined using analysis of covariance and logistic regression. Subgroup analyses were not conducted.
Citation: Catalano, Richard F., Randy R. Gainey, Charles B. Fleming, Kevin P. Haggerty, and Norman O. Johnson. 1999. “An Experimental Intervention With Families of Substance Abusers: One-Year Follow-Up of the Focus on Families Project.” Addiction 94(2):241–54.
This study is a high-quality randomized controlled trial.
Study Title: Long-Term Effects of the Focus on Families Project on Substance Use Disorders Among Children of Parents in Methadone Treatment (which is associated with outcomes Alcohol Use, Alcohol dependence, Any substance abuse , Cocaine/amphetamine abuse , Opiate abuse , Marijuana use, and Dependence on drugs)
Research Design/Sample
Haggerty and colleagues (2008) conducted a follow-up of the Catalano and colleagues (1999) study to examine the impacts of the Families Facing the Future intervention 12 to 15 years after initial participation. Of the original sample, evaluators were able to locate 151 of the original 178 children. Since the sample was of families and included siblings, one child from each family was randomly selected for inclusion in the analysis, leaving a total final sample of 126 children at follow-up (treatment n = 71, control n = 55).
At follow-up, children were mostly male (55 percent) and were ages 15 to 29, with an average age of 22. There were statistically significant differences between the groups; there were more white children in the treatment group (67 percent) than in the control group (48 percent), despite parents’ being block randomized on race during the original randomization, and mortality rates (added as a control variable) at follow-up were higher for parents of the intervention group (32 percent) than for the control (13 percent).
Outcome Measures/Data Collection
Substance abuse disorders (abuse of alcohol, marijuana, opiates, cocaine/amphetamines, hallucinogens and inhalants, or any substance, and alcohol dependence) as described by the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM–IV) were measured using the Composite International Diagnostic Interview. Dependence on drugs was a combined measure of dependence on any substance, marijuana, opiates, or cocaine/amphetamines.
Statistical Analysis
A Cox proportional hazard model was used to assess the outcomes, and an intent-to-treat analysis was conducted. Subgroup analyses were conducted to examine the possible interactions that sex had on the impact of the intervention.
Citation: Haggerty, Kevin P., Martie L. Skinner, Charles B. Fleming, Randy R. Gainey, and Richard F. Catalano. 2008. “Long-Term Effects of the Focus on Families Project on Substance Use Disorders Among Children of Parents in Methadone Treatment.” Addiction 103:2008–16.
This study is a high-quality randomized controlled trial.
The following outcomes were considered in the scored studies, but CrimeSolutions Study Reviewers determined the evidence was insufficient for a rating to be assigned:
- Relapse/refusal
- Domestic conflict
- Family bonding
- Family conflict
- Parental recognition
- Attachment scale
- Association with negative peers
- School attachment
- School grades
- Cigarette use
- Delinquency scale
- Parental involvement
Subgroup Analyses
Haggerty and colleagues (2008) conducted a subgroup analysis to determine the possible interactions that sex had on the effectiveness of the Families Facing the Future intervention. They found that the intervention statistically significantly reduced the likelihood of a diagnosed alcohol or marijuana abuse disorder in males. However, females in the intervention group demonstrated a higher likelihood of being diagnosed with a substance use disorder, though this difference was not statistically significant.
Facilitators follow a curriculum and an accompanying workbook which are available through the Social Development Research Group of the School of Social Work at the University of Washington. Information can be found on the Families Facing the Future website: https://depts.washington.edu/sdrg/.
These sources were used in the development of the program profile:
Catalano, Richard F., J. David Hawkins. 1996. “The Social Development Model: A Theory of Antisocial Behavior.” In Delinquency and Crime: Current Theories, ed. J. David Hawkins. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press, 149–197.
Gainey, Randy R., Kevin P. Haggerty, Charles B. Fleming, and Richard F. Catalano. 2007. “Teaching Parenting Skills in a Methadone Treatment Setting.” Social Work Research 31(3):185–190.
Haggerty, Kevin P., Charles B. Fleming, Richard F. Catalano, Renee S. Petrie, Ronald J. Rubin, and Mary H. Grassley. 2008. “Ten Years Later: Locating and Interviewing Children of Drug Abusers.” Evaluation and Program Planning 31(1):1–9.
Skinner, Martie L., Kevin P. Haggerty, Charles B. Fleming, and Richard F. Catalano. 2009. “Predicting Functional Resilience Among Young-Adult Children of Opiate-Dependent Parents.” Journal of Adolescent Health 44:283–390.
Plotnick, Robert D., Diane S. Young, Richard F. Catalano, and Kevin P. Haggerty. 1998. Benefits and Costs of a Family-Focused Methadone Treatment and Drug Abuse Prevention Program: Preliminary Findings. Seattle, WA: University of Washington.
Following are CrimeSolutions-rated programs that are related to this practice:
In general family-based treatment practices consist of a wide range of interventions that are designed to change dysfunctional family patterns that contribute to the onset and maintenance of adolescent delinquency and other problem behaviors. This practice is rated Effective for reducing recidivism, and Promising for reducing antisocial behavior and substance use, and improving psychological functioning and school performance.
Evidence Ratings for Outcomes
|
|
Crime & Delinquency - Multiple crime/offense types |
|
|
Mental Health & Behavioral Health - Externalizing behavior |
|
|
Drugs & Substance Abuse - Multiple substances |
|
|
Mental Health & Behavioral Health - Psychological functioning |
|
|
Education - Academic achievement/school performance |
Following are CrimeSolutions-rated programs that are related to this program:
This is a family-centered intervention, which addresses family dynamics to prevent substance use and problem behaviors in adolescents. The program is rated Effective. Students in the treatment group were found to report less substance use, including alcohol, tobacco, and marijuana; and demonstrate less antisocial behavior, compared with students in the control group. These differences were all statistically significant.
This is a multilevel prevention program for high-risk families with children ages 2–5 years, which is designed to lower children’s risk of future substance abuse and other high-risk activities by improving parenting skills. The program is rated Promising. Intervention group parents reported a statistically significant improvement in child development, a reduction in child oppositional behaviors, and an improvement in parental self-efficacy, compared with control group parents.
This program was originally rated Ineffective. It has been re-reviewed based on the change in the program rating instrument. Under the new instrument, CrimeSolutions now rates individual program outcomes and no longer assigns an overall rating.
Rating Process
Program Status
This program is Active.