Profile Updated:
Summary: This is a school-based education program designed to teach students about domestic violence, healthy and unhealthy relationships, and legal rights. The program is rated Effective for increasing knowledge of dating violence and the law. The program is rated Ineffective for reducing dating violence perpetration, dating violence victimization, and the acceptance of person-on-person aggression. (Review the full program description).
| Title | Rating | Details | Outcome Category | Study(ies) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Knowledge of laws related to dating violence | Youth in the intervention group knew more about the laws related to dating violence compared with youth in the control group who did not participate. The difference was statistically significant. |
Attitudes/Beliefs/Knowledge; Knowledge | Jaycox, Lisa H., Daniel McCaffrey, Beth Eiseman, Jessica Aronoff, Gene Shelley, Rebecca Collins, and Grant Marshall. 2006. “Impact of a School-Based Dating Violence Prevention Program among Latino Teens: Randomized Controlled Effectiveness Trial.” Journal of Adolescent Health 36:694–704. See evaluation methods. |
|
| Dating violence perpetration | There was no statistically significant difference in dating violence perpetration between youth in the intervention group and youth in the control group who did not participate. |
Crime and Delinquency; Violence offenses; Domestic violence/intimate partner violence/family violence | Jaycox, Lisa H., Daniel McCaffrey, Beth Eiseman, Jessica Aronoff, Gene Shelley, Rebecca Collins, and Grant Marshall. 2006. “Impact of a School-Based Dating Violence Prevention Program among Latino Teens: Randomized Controlled Effectiveness Trial.” Journal of Adolescent Health 36:694–704. See evaluation methods. |
|
| Dating violence victimization | There was no statistically significant difference in dating violence victimization between youth in the intervention group and youth in the control group who did not participate. |
Victimization; Domestic violence/intimate partner violence/family violence victimization | Jaycox, Lisa H., Daniel McCaffrey, Beth Eiseman, Jessica Aronoff, Gene Shelley, Rebecca Collins, and Grant Marshall. 2006. “Impact of a School-Based Dating Violence Prevention Program among Latino Teens: Randomized Controlled Effectiveness Trial.” Journal of Adolescent Health 36:694–704. See evaluation methods. |
|
| Acceptance of person-on-person aggression | Overall, there was no statistically significant difference in the acceptance of person-on-person aggression between youth in the intervention group and youth in the control group who did not participate, based on multiple measures from the study. |
Attitudes/Beliefs/Knowledge; Antisocial beliefs/attitudes | Jaycox, Lisa H., Daniel McCaffrey, Beth Eiseman, Jessica Aronoff, Gene Shelley, Rebecca Collins, and Grant Marshall. 2006. “Impact of a School-Based Dating Violence Prevention Program among Latino Teens: Randomized Controlled Effectiveness Trial.” Journal of Adolescent Health 36:694–704. See evaluation methods. |
Program Goals/Target Population
Ending Violence is a school-based prevention program designed to teach high school students about domestic violence, healthy and unhealthy relationships, and legal rights. The program aims to reverse acceptance of violence by emphasizing that intimate partner violence is illegal, and to increase knowledge and help-seeking behaviors by providing information and resources.
Key Personnel
The program is taught by attorneys to emphasize the legal dimension of the program and increase students’ comfort levels in speaking with individuals in the legal profession.
Program Components
The program comprises a brief, three-class-session curriculum that is delivered during students’ health classes. In the three one-hour classes, attorneys teach youth about laws that protect victims of domestic violence and punish those who commit crimes. The first class is an overview of domestic violence and discusses topics such as warning signs of potentially abusive relationships, myths and misconceptions related to dating and domestic violence, and types of violence and abuse. The second class focuses on laws related to domestic violence and legal options for victims of domestic violence. The last class focuses on safety planning and restraining orders.
Program Theory
The Ending Violence curriculum is consistent with Bandura’s (1977) social learning theory, which suggests that behavior is learned through direct behavior, modeled behavior, or observed occurrences. The theory suggests that behavior is largely guided by emotional reactions and rewards and punishments that follow a given action. The program aims to reverse students’ acceptance of domestic violence by stressing its illegality, increasing knowledge about domestic violence and related laws, and providing resources for potential victims.
Study Title: Impact of a School-Based Dating Violence Prevention Program Among Latino Teens: Randomized Controlled Effectiveness Trial (which is associated with outcomes Knowledge of laws related to dating violence, Dating violence perpetration, Dating violence victimization, and Acceptance of person-on-person aggression)
Research Design
Jaycox and colleagues (2006) conducted a randomized controlled trial of the impact of the Ending Violence curriculum on dating violence outcomes with 9th-grade students from the Los Angeles Unified School District. The evaluation took place over a 3-year period (2001–2004). This study recruited from tracks within large urban high schools with at least 80 percent Latino students. With one exception, all schools operated on a year-round calendar in which students were assigned to one of three schedules or “tracks.” Tracks were randomized within schools to intervention conditions to increase the power to detect changes (relative to randomization of schools), while controlling for potential contamination (relative to randomization of classrooms). Six schools participated in the first cohort, five in the second cohort, and six in the third cohort (including five schools that had participated in the first cohort, and one that had participated in the second). The schools that participated in more than 1 year of the intervention were only randomized once.
Sample
A total of 2,540 9th-grade students from 110 classes in 10 high schools in the Los Angeles Unified School District were included in the sample. Health classes were randomly selected within tracks to participate in either the intervention group (1,384 students), who received the Ending Violence curriculum, or the control group (1,156 students), who received the standard health curriculum.
The majority of the total study sample was of Latino descent (92 percent), 75 percent were U.S. born, roughly half were female (52 percent), and the average age was 14.4 years. At baseline, there were no statistically significant differences between the treatment and control groups, except that the control group reported less acceptance of female-on-male aggression and a higher likelihood of seeking help related to violence.
Data Collection
Both the intervention group and the control group were followed for six months. For intervention classes, pretest surveys were given on Monday, the Ending Violence intervention was administered Tuesday through Thursday, and the posttest surveys were administered on Friday. Control groups followed the same schedule, with the traditional health class curriculum being taught in place of the Ending Violence intervention. Follow-up surveys were administered in class six months after the curriculum ended. Although parents were notified of the intervention, consent was not required for students to participate in the health class because violence prevention is a part of the school district’s curriculum. However, parental consent and student assent were required for participation in the survey.
Outcome Measures
The outcomes examined were knowledge of dating violence and the laws, the approval of unprovoked male-on-female aggression, the approval of unprovoked female-on-male aggression, dating violence perpetration, and dating violence victimization. All measures were self-reported and were standardized as z-scores, having a mean of zero and a standard deviation of one at baseline. The authors developed separate scales to assess knowledge of dating violence and the law, and the approval of unprovoked male-on-female aggression and unprovoked female-on-male aggression. The Revised Conflict Tactics Scale assessed victimization and perpetration in relationships among those students who dated. Because dating violence is reportable as child abuse in California, the authors gathered these data anonymously. The outcome of acceptance of person-on-person aggression was a combined measure of approval of unprovoked male-on-female aggression and approval of unprovoked female-on-male aggression.
Statistical Analysis
The effects of the program on outcomes were tested by examining the differences between the adjusted means for students in the treatment and control groups. Because the anonymous dating violence data lacked identifiers for linking students’ outcomes across waves or to classrooms, the authors tested these data for an intervention effect at the follow-up
period using analysis of covariance, controlling for the preintervention-track mean and adjusting for clustering of students within track-years. No subgroup analysis was conducted.
Citation:
Jaycox, Lisa H., Daniel McCaffrey, Beth Eiseman, Jessica Aronoff, Gene Shelley, Rebecca Collins, and Grant Marshall. 2006. “Impact of a School-Based Dating Violence Prevention Program among Latino Teens: Randomized Controlled Effectiveness Trial.” Journal of Adolescent Health 36:694–704.
This study is a high-quality randomized controlled trial.
These sources were used in the development of the program profile:
Bandura, Albert. 1977. Social Learning Theory. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice Hall.
Jaycox, Lisa H., Jessica Aronoff, and Gene A. Shelley. 2007. The Break the Cycle Evaluation Project. Arlington, VA: RAND
Following are CrimeSolutions-rated programs that are related to this practice:
This practice involves a range of prevention and intervention programs that are designed to address problems associated with dating violence for youth and young adults. The practice is rated Effective for reducing the perpetration of dating violence and improving dating violence knowledge and attitudes. The practice is rated Ineffective for reducing dating and sexual violence victimization, reducing sexual violence perpetration, and for improving bystander behaviors.
Evidence Ratings for Outcomes
|
|
Attitudes & Beliefs - Dating violence knowledge |
|
|
Attitudes & Beliefs - Dating violence attitudes |
|
|
Crime & Delinquency - Violent offenses |
|
|
Victimization - Bystander behavior and intentions |
|
|
Crime & Delinquency - Sex-related offenses |
|
|
Victimization - Sexual abuse/exploitation |
|
|
Victimization - Domestic/intimate partner/family violence |
Following are CrimeSolutions-rated programs that are related to this program:
This is a prevention program for middle and high school students, which is designed to stop or prevent dating violence perpetration and victimization. This program is rated Effective. The intervention group showed statistically significant reductions in psychological, physical, and sexual abuse perpetration, and physical abuse victimization, compared with the control group at the 4-year follow up; however, there were no significant differences between groups on sexual abuse victimization.
This interactive classroom curriculum is designed to reduce youth dating violence by addressing bullying, unsafe sexual behavior, and substance use. The program is rated Ineffective. The program had small, statistically significant effects on decreasing dating violence and sexual harassment/assault victimization. However, there were no significant effects on sexual harassment/assault perpetration, peer violence perpetration or victimization, sexual activity, substance use, or prosocial attitudes.
A health education program for 7th and 8th graders designed to delay sexual behavior and promote healthy dating relationships. The program is rated Promising. The program was shown to statistically significantly reduce emotional and physical dating violence victimization. However, the program did not have a statistically significant effect on physical perpetration of dating violence.
This dual intervention aims to reduce peer violence and sexual harassment in middle schoolers by emphasizing consequences and increasing surveillance of unsafe areas. The program is rated Promising. The intervention group had statistically significant reductions in sexual victimization and in violence victimization and perpetration compared with those in the control group. There were no statistically significant effects on sexual harassment perpetration, or knowledge, attitudes, or intentions.
This program was originally rated Ineffective. It has been re-reviewed based on the change in the program rating instrument. Under the new instrument, CrimeSolutions now rates individual program outcomes and no longer assigns an overall rating.
Rating Process
Program Status
This program is Not Active.